Log in to your CoinTracker account to give feedback

Bugs

Report
bugs
to our support team to ensure they’re documented and quickly addressed. Use this board to track the status of issues as they progress through our resolution process.
Solana DeFi Transactions Labeled as "Multiple" May Lose Cost Basis Due To Order Of Operations
What is the issue? Some Solana transactions that interact with DeFi protocols like Kamino Finance are categorized in a transaction labeled as "Multiple". In the "multiple" transactions are a group of individual transactions such as trades, add/remove liquidity, staking, etc. However, the order of operations may be miscalculated resulting in a negative balance. Example: "Multiple" transaction that contains a borrow and lending deposit may have the asset show the lending deposit first before the borrow. As a user, what should I do? You can upvote this forum post to indicate you are experiencing this behavior. The post status will be changed to Complete once a fix is rolled out to all users. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. Is there a workaround? As a workaround, users can ignore the "multiple" transactions that are affected by this issue and instead recreate the individual transactions manually. For the outflow (send) transaction, users can create it a second after the inflow (receive) transaction to ensure the order of operations is correct. Example: -"Multiple" transaction containing a borrow and lending deposit. -Recreate the Borrow (inflow) transaction first with the same date and time as the original "multiple transaction. -Recreate the Lending Deposit (outflow) transaction with the same date but the time being a second after the Borrow transaction. Note that when the team addresses the issue, these manual edits could result in duplicate transactions. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: Solana DeFi, review suggested error, transaction classification, swap issue, liquidity pool, borrow, lending
3
·

confirmed

Exodus wallets are not correctly imported
Users may experience: Some wallets added through the Exodus integration are failing to pull either balances, transactions, or both. This is most commonly seen with Cardano Wallets with a known balance sync but with zero transactions The wallet does not sync at all. Note : Not all wallets on Exodus are supported by CoinTracker it is expected that these wallets not add to CoinTracker regardless if the wallet has a balance on Exodus. Expected behavior: It is expected that all supported blockchain addresses pull a complete transaction history into CoinTracker. As a user, what should I do? For a small number of missing transactions , users can manually input them into CoinTracker by following our guide: How to Manually Add a Transaction If the blockchain address is supported , consider removing the Exodus integration and directly adding the blockchain address instead. Here’s how: How to add wallets and exchanges to CoinTracker . For unsupported chains , users can import the transactions using a CSV file. Detailed instructions are available here: Importing Transaction Histories to CoinTracker Using CSVs . How can users provide feedback? You can upvote this forum post to indicate you are experiencing this behavior. The post status will be changed to Complete once a fix is rolled out to all users. Up-voters will be notified of the status change. I need additional assistance, who can I contact? For further assistance, please contact our support team directly . Thank you for your understanding and cooperation as we work to enhance your CoinTracker experience! Keywords: Exodus, wallets, balances, sync
10
·

being verified

Load More